Numerical reasoning
~10-15 questions · ~60-90 seconds per question
What it tests. Numerical fluency and working memory under severe time pressure.
Worked example. A Strategic Advisory division generates $140M in Q1, a 15% increase over Q4; if Restructuring Q4 revenue was 40% of Strategic Advisory Q4 revenue, what was it? Work back: $140M divided by 1.15 is about $121.7M, and 40% of that is about $48.7M.
Common traps. The exact-match trap (stopping a step early, e.g. at $121.7M) and over-calculating to the fourth decimal when rounding would eliminate options.
How to handle it. Round aggressively to eliminate options; if stuck for 30 seconds, guess and move on.
Verbal reasoning
~10-12 passages · Under 60 seconds per prompt
What it tests. Comprehension and logical consistency without importing outside knowledge.
Common traps. Extrapolating truth from general industry reality, and missing restrictive modifiers like solely, frequently, never or exclusively.
How to handle it. Read the statement before skimming the passage; treat the text like an airtight legal document.
Logical / inductive reasoning
Timed set · ~45-60 seconds per puzzle
What it tests. Fluid intelligence, spatial reasoning and rapid rule induction.
Common traps. Single-rule focus (solving one pattern and ignoring a second concurrent rule) and fixating on one puzzle.
How to handle it. Track one element at a time (icon, then background, then shading); if stuck after 20 seconds, eliminate options that violate symmetry.
Situational Judgement Test (SJT)
What it tests. Professional judgment, accountability, calibrated escalation and ethics within the banking hierarchy.
Worked example. You find an 11pm hardcoding error inflating EBITDA in a model behind an already-printed pitchbook for a 9am MD meeting, and the associate has left. The strongest path verifies and quantifies the error, drafts a concrete fix, and communicates transparently with the associate rather than hiding it or bypassing the chain of command.
Common traps. The hero fallacy (fixing a mistake in secret) and the passive pass-off (escalating every minor issue without drafting a solution first).
How to handle it. Verify, formulate a fix, then communicate up the chain; never ignore an error or shift blame.
Personality and behavioral questionnaire
What it tests. Resilience, attention to detail, achievement striving and cooperation versus a benchmark profile.
Common traps. The perfect-candidate illusion (a built-in social-desirability scale flags inconsistent profiles) and middle-of-the-road neutrality that yields a flat, low-signal profile.
How to handle it. Answer consistently as an analytical, meticulous, resilient professional; be decisive on traits that matter (detail, execution, ethics).